I was having a discussion with a pal today who, although very liberal of all issues, is somewhat middle of the trail as it pertains to gun control. He’s not against concealed carry, but does favor a lot more background checks – especially on sales from a private individual to private individual.
He’s somewhat surprised that I am against this. “Why?”, he asked.
First, i’d like to preface my reasoning with only a little information regarding me. I am no anarchist. I am not really a doomsday prepper. I do not believe we’re due for a revolution, certainly not within my lifetime. I like having SOME government (don’t tell my anti-statist friends though). Many of these beliefs being so, I must admit that I really do fear for the generations that come after my death (I do hope to have at the very least another 40 years, which would get me into my 80s).
So back to my friend. Why do I disagree with him? Well, it is simple. Background checks on every sale, specifically private individual to private individual, would result in a nationwide gun registry. I am very much against having among these.
My friend countered, very proudly I may add, that people must register our cars. Why don’t you our guns? That is simple. Nowhere in the constitution does it guarantee the best to help keep and own cars. All of us caved on the licensing of cars and drivers of a hundred years ago.
Our founding fathers specifically put verbiage in the constitution allowing us to help keep and bear arms. STI Firearms You can find different interpretations in regards to what they meant, but I think at the very least part of these reasoning was so that people could protect ourselves from a tyrannical government or those who wish to do us harm.
Do I think which our government is tyrannical? Well, nearly yet. We are still the most free nation on earth. I really do not like to path our country is on, but I do not feel it is to late to right the ship.
Having a national gun registry would result in forced gun buy-backs or even confiscation during some future crisis (either natural or man-made). Having our abilities to protect ourselves from criminals and/or government listed in a database could be sharing information that’s much too personal.
The street to hell is paved with good intentions. Government is proficient at making us genuinely believe that being safer (their definition) is worth giving up a couple of rights. Forcing people everywhere to join up their private, constitutionally protected guns is really a bad idea.
I can foresee that guns would even get linked with addresses where their owners no further live. Imagine if you moved in to a home where the last occupants had several guns registered and the police came trying to find those folks? All of us understand that police, a lot of them being great people, do make mistakes when their adrenaline levels are too high. Would you need your home getting shot up because the last residents had guns listed in the registry?
During a so-called “state of emergency” you can bet some local, state or national governments will make a proceed to take any weapons that didn’t reside in the hands of government personnel. It has happened. See the video below.
I believe that it is none of the government’s business if I own a rifle (or guns). Yes, I need to do the exact same background check as someone else when I obtain a new gun. But do you consider that having a national registry would keep guns out from the hands of individuals who couldn’t pass a background check? Not really a chance. I think you’d see lots of gun owners reporting their guns stolen to be able to sell their guns to whomever they desire – just like they are able to now.
When times get bad, whose doors are agents of the us government (police or military ) going to be knocking down when they go on the gun collection binges? I’ll tell you – the door’s which are on the addresses within the gun registry.
While we do not already have a government that kicks in doors and gives gas showers or firing squads to people they cannot like, we do not understand what our government will look like in 50 or 100 years. I need my children and grandchildren to manage to defend themselves from both a tyrannical government or a homicidal maniac (I suppose they may be one and the exact same though).
Starting a national gun registry is the first step to taking guns from people the us government does not need possessing guns. Currently this type of person felons and people that have mental problems. Who might these future gunless people be? Folks of particular political parties? Folks of certain economic classes? Folks of certain religions? It’s all happened throughout world history. We pretend to function as enlightened Americans but we have factions that are looking to take all our freedoms and give all the ability to the us government the same as dictators of past and present we have all heard of.
So how exactly does this happen? We have to look at it from two avenues. First the gradual lack of gun rights for anyone through new “minor” restrictive gun laws. Second, the whole lack of gun rights for specific groups of people the us government has targeted. Imagine a candle burning at both ends. As one end burns, more and more of the governments enemies are specifically forbidden to have guns. As the other end burns, more and more of the typical population are receiving the remainder of these gun rights recinded as well. When the flames meet at the center we’re left without any guns for those who, and we have a government with nothing to fear. That is the nightmare of the slippery slope.